作者:[美] 彼得·格雷

中文题目:自主教育和激进教育之间的区别

Differences Between Self-Directed and Progressive Education
(Section 6)

(22)Kohn’s “cartoon” characterization of Self-Directed Education is not quite right—because children do, on their own, regularly choose to do things that aren’t fun in an immediate sense and because staff members don’t just stand around observing and beaming; but, yet, it is not too far off the mark. And it does work. Don’t trust me on that; read and think skeptically about the evidence. Follow-up studies of graduates of schools for Self-Directed Education and of grown unschoolers have shown that people, who educated themselves by following their own interests, are doing very well in life. You can read much more about this in previous posts on this blog, in various academic articles (e.g. here, here, and here), and in my book Free to Learn.

(23)Self-Directed Education works because we are biologically designed for it. Throughout essentially all of human history, children educated themselves by exploring, playing, watching and listening to others, and figuring out and pursuing their own goals in life (e.g. here and Gray, 2016). In an extensive review of the anthropological literature on education cross-culturally, David Lancy (2016)) concluded that learning—including the learning that comprises education—is natural to human beings, but teaching and being taught is not. Winston Churchill’s claim, “I always like to learn, but I don’t always like to be taught,” is something that anyone, any time, any place, could have said.

(24)Children’s educative instincts still work beautifully, in our modern society, as long as we provide the conditions that enable them to work. The same instincts that motivated hunter-gatherer children to learn to hunt, gather, and do all that they had to do to become effective adults motivate children in our society to learn to read, calculate with numbers, operate computers, and do all that they have to do to become effective adults (see Gray, 2016). Self-Directed Education is so natural, so much more pleasant and efficient for everyone than is coercive education, that it seems inevitable to me that it will once again become the standard educational route.

(25)Coercive schooling has been a blip in human history, designed to serve temporary ends that arose with industrialization and the need to suppress creativity and free will (see here). Coercive schooling is in the process now of burning itself out, in a kind of final flaring up. Once people re-discover that Self-Directed Education works, and doesn’t cause the stress and harm that coercive schooling does, and we begin to divert some fraction of the billions of dollars currently spent on coercive education to the provision of resources for Self-Directed Education for all children, Self-Directed Education will once again become the standard educational route. Then we’ll be able to drop the capital letters. And then we won’t need progressive education to soften the harsh blows of coercive education.

 

(26)And now, what do you think? Do you agree with this analysis of the difference between progressive education and Self-Directed Education? Do you agree, or not, that Self-Directed Education will replace coercive education in the not-too-distant future? This blog is, among other things, a forum for discussion, and your views and knowledge are valued and taken seriously by me and other readers. Make your thoughts known in the comments section below. As always, I prefer if you post your comments and questions here rather than send them to me by private email. By putting them here, you share with other readers, not just with me. I read all comments and try to respond to all serious questions if I feel I have something useful to add to what others have said.

One thought on “Differences Between Self-Directed and Progressive Education (6)”

  1. Tuesday, 03 November 2020 10:34

     

    (22)科恩对自我导向教育的“卡通”描述并不十分正确,因为孩子们自己经常会选择做眼前不好玩的事情,而且工作人员不会只是站在旁边观察和微笑。 但是,这也离目标不远。它确实有效。在这一点不要相信我,要对证据持怀疑态度。 对自主教育学校毕业生和成年非学校学生的后续研究表明,通过追求自己的兴趣进行自我教育的人在生活中表现的非常好。你可以在博客的前几篇文章各种学术文章( 例如这里)和我的免费学习中了解更多。

     

    (23)自我指导教育之所以有效,是因为我们在生物学上就是为此而设计的。纵观整个人类历史,孩子们通过探索、玩耍、观察和倾听他人,寻找并追求自己的人生目标来教育自己(例如:here and gray,2016)在一篇关于跨文化教育的人类学文献综述中,大卫·兰西(2016)总结道:学习-—包括包涵教育的学习,对于人类来说是自然的,但教与被教不是。温斯顿·丘吉尔曾说过:“我总是喜欢学习,但我不喜欢总是被人教导。”这句话是任何人 在任何时间任何地点都可能说过的。

     

    (24)在当代社会中,只要为孩子们提供工作条件,他们的教育就依然发挥着良好的作用。同样的是他们自己有本能动机狩猎的孩子去学习捕猎,和做他们必须做的一切,成为有效的成人激发儿童学习阅读在用数字计算,操作电脑。指导教育是如此自然,对每个人来说都比强制教育更愉快和有效,在我看来,它将不可避免地再次成为标准的教育路线。

     

    (25)强制性教育是人类历史上的一个小插曲,目的是为了满足工业化带来的临时目的,以及抑制创造力和自由意志的需要。强制教育正处于自我毁灭的过程中,在一种最后的爆发中。一旦人们重新发现自主教育工作行之有效,并且不会造成强制性教育的压力和伤害,我们便开始将目前用于强制性教育的数十亿美元中的一部分转移到为自我提供资源上面向所有儿童的定向教育,自主学习将再次成为标准的教育途径。然后,我们可以删除大写字母。我们将不需要渐进式教育来减轻强制性教育的严峻打击。

     

    (26)现在,您怎么看?您是否同意这种渐进式教育和自主教育之间差距的分析?您是否同意,在不久的将来,自我指导教育将取代强制性教育?除其他事项外,该博客是一个讨论论坛,我和其他读者珍视并认真对待您的观点和知识,在下面的部分中表达您的想法,与往常一样,我希望您在这里发表您的评论和问题,而不是通过私人邮件将其发送给我,通过将他们放在此处,您可以与其他读者分享,而不仅仅是与我分享,我阅读了所有的评论,并且尝试回答所有严重的问题,我觉得我可以在其他人的发言中添加一些有用的内容。

     

     

    注:第22段由王春赟同学翻译;第23段由苏家誉同学翻译;第24段由孙雪蕊同学翻译;第25段由瞿琳同学翻译;第26段由乔珊同学翻译。指导:李燕老师。

召集中…

─────────────────────────

☆☆☆☆☆  急召:

翻译、摄影爱好者,无论段位。

─────────────────────────

☆☆☆ 共建者:

对非主流教育有兴趣做研究的年青人;

对自主学习的实践有经验的大、小朋友;

愿意和大家分享的自己知识和见解的;

希望参与共学社会建设的搞事情的人。